Practical Guides

Securing Distributed Energy Resources: Solar, Wind, Storage and EV Charging

In 2022, a satellite outage tied to the invasion of Ukraine knocked out remote monitoring of around 5,800 Enercon wind turbines across Europe, a stark reminder that distributed generation depends on fragile, internet-reliant connectivity. As the UK adds solar farms, battery storage and EV charging at pace, it is creating millions of small, cloud-managed, internet-connected assets that aggregate into grid-scale capacity. Securing distributed energy resources (DER) is now a national-grid problem, not a niche one, and this guide sets out the approach.

A 2022 satellite outage disrupted remote monitoring of roughly 5,800 wind turbines across Europe, showing how dependent DER is on connectivity.

Why DER Changes the Risk Picture

Traditional generation concentrated risk in a handful of large, well-defended sites. Distributed energy resources invert that: capacity is spread across thousands of solar inverters, turbines, battery systems and chargers, most managed remotely through vendor clouds and mobile apps. Individually each is small, but aggregated through a virtual power plant or aggregator, a coordinated compromise could affect meaningful grid capacity. The attack surface is wider, more internet-facing and more dependent on third parties than ever.

  • Capacity is distributed across thousands of small assets
  • Most are cloud-managed and internet-connected by default
  • Aggregation means small assets can matter at grid scale
  • Third-party platforms and apps own much of the control path

Solar and Wind Farm Security

Solar and wind sites combine OT, such as inverters and turbine controllers, with cloud-based monitoring and remote maintenance. The same fundamentals apply as in any OT estate: segment the control network, eliminate direct internet exposure, and put MFA-protected, monitored access in front of every remote-management path. Particular attention belongs on inverter and controller firmware, which has repeatedly been found to ship with default credentials and exposed management interfaces.

  • Segment inverter and turbine control networks from IT
  • Remove internet exposure of management interfaces
  • Change default credentials and harden firmware
  • Govern vendor remote maintenance with MFA and session logging

Battery Storage and EV Charging

Battery energy storage systems and EV charging infrastructure add their own exposure. Chargers are public-facing devices on the internet, often using protocols such as OCPP that have had authentication weaknesses, and they connect to back-end platforms that handle payments and grid signals. Storage systems concentrate fast-responding capacity that an attacker could try to manipulate. Securing both means hardening the device, securing the back-end platform, and protecting the communication between them.

  • Treat public chargers as hostile-environment, internet-facing devices
  • Secure OCPP and back-end platform communications
  • Protect payment and grid-signalling pathways
  • Monitor battery storage controls for anomalous dispatch commands

Managing the Third-Party and Supply-Chain Risk

Because so much of DER is operated through vendor clouds, third-party risk management is central rather than optional. Operators need assurance over the security of the platforms controlling their assets, clear contractual security obligations, and visibility of the internet-facing exposure those vendors create on their behalf. The aggregator or virtual power plant layer deserves particular scrutiny, since it can issue commands across many assets at once.

  • Assess the security of vendor and aggregator platforms
  • Set contractual security and notification obligations
  • Map the internet-facing exposure vendors create
  • Scrutinise aggregation layers that can command many assets

How Kyanite Blue and Hadrian Help

Kyanite Blue helps DER operators get visibility and control over a sprawling, internet-facing estate. Hadrian continuous attack surface management discovers exposed inverters, chargers, controllers and management interfaces from the attacker perspective, including the third-party platforms operating on your behalf, so you find weaknesses before adversaries do. We then prioritise the exposures that matter, harden remote access, and build the third-party assurance process that distributed, cloud-managed generation demands.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is DER cybersecurity a grid-scale concern?

Individually each solar inverter, turbine or charger is small, but aggregated through virtual power plants and aggregators they represent meaningful capacity. A coordinated compromise of many internet-connected assets could affect grid stability, so DER security is now a national, not niche, concern.

What is the biggest weakness in EV charging security?

EV chargers are public-facing internet devices that connect to back-end platforms handling payments and grid signals, and the protocols involved have had authentication weaknesses. The biggest exposure is the combination of an unhardened public device and an insufficiently secured back-end platform.

How do you manage cyber risk across thousands of distributed assets?

Use continuous attack surface management to discover and prioritise internet-facing exposures at scale, harden remote access and firmware, and apply rigorous third-party assurance over the vendor clouds that operate the assets. Visibility across the whole estate is the foundation everything else depends on.

Get visibility of your distributed energy attack surface

Kyanite Blue specialises in cybersecurity for iGaming operators. MGA-licensed operators across Malta trust our stack.

Get in touch

Featured Product

Hadrian

Learn more

Ready to secure your iGaming operation?

MGA-licensed operators across Malta trust Kyanite Blue.